While both tools cover much of the same ground, they do so in different ways. That way, everyone can push to production while the process of building, running tests and deploying is done automatically so they can focus on the next feature or bug fix. Each team member gets immediate feedback about the production readiness of their code, even if they just changed a single line. TeamCity and Jenkins are CI tools that allow developers to integrate code branches during the development process and run a series of automated tests against them. Instead of pushing once a quarter, continuous integration, continuous delivery and testing make go-live another simple routine deployment. The more you can build and test during development, the less software engineers have to worry about pushing to production. The logic behind this is simple but only came in response to problems in the traditional deployment cycle. With continuous integration, teams compile software and run it through a series of tests that mimic the production environment to ensure a successful build when pushed to production. Continuous integration is often combined with continuous delivery to achieve faster and more stable build processes with automation. That's TeamCity vs Jenkins in short but continue reading for a deep dive into continuous integration and why more and more software development teams are using these tools to speed up their release cycle.Ĭontinuous integration, source control and build management are formative concepts behind DevOps, driven by the need to regularly integrate new and change code in the master repository of version control systems like Github or Atlassian's Bitbucket.

TeamCity is easier to configure and more straightforward to use, while Jenkins has a rich plugin ecosystem and integrations. Jenkins is an open source continuous integration tool, while TeamCity is a proprietary offering from JetBrains.

Download teamcity ci cd